Diagnostics
Free AI Visibility Report · 48-hour delivery

See why AI doesn't mention your brand.

We grade your domain against the mention signals ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews use to pick sources. You get a three-pillar grade, the 5 priority queries you're losing, and a prioritized 90-day plan.

Free · No credit card · 48-hour delivery

Scored against the platforms your buyers use
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Claude
Gemini
Google AI Overviews
Copilot
5 platforms modeled: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews
// Coverage
5 priority queries run in your category — the ones your buyers actually ask
// Depth
90-day prioritized action plan — quick wins, 30-day rebuild, and long-tail content
// Output
// Sample report

What your report looks like.

Below is a real report we delivered. Brand name redacted at the client's request. Every finding, query, and competitor benchmark is exactly what landed in the deliverable.

ai-visibility-report / [client-domain].com / 2026-05-05
// Executive summary

Visibility today: effectively zero on AI surfaces.

Priority queries 0/5 in top 10 organic
Robots.txt 4 major AI bots blocked
Authority signal 1 quantified claim sitewide

[Client] did not appear in the top-10 organic results for any of the 5 priority queries run. More urgently, AI assistants likely cannot mention the site at all because robots.txt blocks the major AI crawlers. The good news: solid content infrastructure exists. The problems are mostly fixable with focused work over 30–90 days.

// Critical blocker — fix before anything else

The robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot.

Without this fix, every other improvement below has limited upside on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and AI Overviews. This is a single dashboard setting in Cloudflare — no code change required.

Bot blocked Platform affected
GPTBot ChatGPT
ClaudeBot Claude (Brave Search)
Google-Extended Gemini + Google AI Overviews
CCBot Common Crawl → most LLM training
// Three pillars findings

Structure, authority, and presence — graded.

// Pillar Structure Extractability
Grade B-
Working
  • Ultimate Guide carries Article + FAQPage schema
  • Long-form definitive content (~5,500 words)
  • Internal linking between guides and services
Broken
  • Homepage opens with brand fluff, not an extractable definition
  • Homepage FAQ block has no FAQPage schema
  • No MedicalOrganization schema (this is a healthcare provider)
  • No comparison tables for "X vs Y" queries
// Pillar Authority Citability
Grade D
Working
  • External mentions exist on the Ultimate Guide
  • Named author byline present
Broken
  • Single quantified claim on the entire homepage ("Since 1988")
  • No credentials shown next to author byline
  • Last-updated dates only in JSON-LD, not visible to readers
  • No peer-reviewed studies, CDC, or NIH mentions
  • No original research or proprietary data
// Pillar Presence Where AI looks
Grade C
Working
  • /llms.txt exists and is reasonably structured
  • Existing 15-state operational footprint
Broken
  • No /pricing.md or /insurance.md for AI agents
  • Minimal Wikipedia presence
  • Brand rarely surfaces in r/Autism or r/ABA discussions
  • Weak G2 / Capterra / Glassdoor footprint
// Authority gap

Quantified claims on the homepage — vs. ranking competitors.

AI systems weight specific, verifiable numbers. When competitors lead with stats and you don't, AI mentions them.

Competitor Competitor A
Claims surfaced

20+ years · 20,000+ children treated · 90% making meaningful progress · 5,000+ staff · 16,200 clinical training hours

Competitor Competitor B
Claims surfaced

90% meaningful progress · 30+ doctoral clinicians · 450 BCBAs · 3,700 BTs

Competitor Competitor C
Claims surfaced

4.9 rating · 250+ reviews · 97% would recommend · 86% reductions in challenging behaviors

Audited brand [Client]
Claims surfaced

"Since 1988"

// Prioritized action plan

What to fix, in order, over 90 days.

01
Unblock AI bots in robots.txt (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended) 15 min

Without this, every other improvement has limited upside on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and AI Overviews.

02
Add FAQPage schema to homepage FAQ block 1 hr

The content already exists. Schema makes it AI-extractable.

03
Add MedicalOrganization schema (not just Organization) 2 hrs

Major entity-recognition signal AI uses for health queries.

04
Add visible "Last updated: [date]" to all guides and posts 1 hr

Freshness signal AI weights heavily — must be visible, not just JSON-LD.

05
Add author credentials next to bylines (e.g., "BCBA-D") 2 hrs

E-E-A-T signal. Without credentials, content reads as marketing.

// Priority queries tested

Where the brand currently surfaces — and where competitors do.

The 5 queries [Client]'s buyers use to find providers like them. The brand ranked in the top 10 for none.

Query Top 10? Competitors ranking
what is ABA therapy autism ✕ Competitor A (#5), Competitor C (#7), Cleveland Clinic, Autism Speaks
best autism therapy options for children ✕ Cleveland Clinic, USAHS, CDC, CHOP, NYU Langone
does insurance cover autism diagnostic evaluation ✕ NCSL, Hopebridge, BCBSM, smaller ABA providers
blended treatment options autistic children ✕ USAHS, CDC, CHOP, AHRQ
early intervention ABA therapy nationwide ✕ Action Behavior, Hopebridge, BlueSprig, Brighter Strides + 3 more

This is the depth you get on yours. Three-pillar grading, the queries you're missing, the competitors taking the mentions, and a 90-day plan you can hand to your team.

Run my report
// How it works

Three steps. 48 hours. No call required.

01

Enter your website

You hand over a URL. That's the entire intake — no calls, no decks, no gated demo.

02

We run the report

A senior strategist runs 5 priority queries in your category and grades your site against the mention signals ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and AI Overviews use to pick sources. We benchmark you against the brands actually getting mentioned.

03

You get the report

Inside 48 hours you receive the full report — exactly the format you saw above. Critical blocker, three-pillar grading, authority gap, queries scored, and a prioritized 90-day plan.

// After the report

The report is free. Acting on it is up to you.

Most teams hand the report to their internal SEO or content lead and ship the quick wins themselves. The 30-day and 90-day work usually requires more lift — that's where our productized programs come in.

We don't gate the report behind a sales call. If you want help, you'll find it. If you don't, the report still tells you exactly what to do.

// Programs

AI Visibility campaigns

Productized 30-day campaigns that build the third-party signals AI engines mention — brand mentions, Reddit signal, and editorial authority. From $3,495.
// Execution

SEO Content Generator

Production-ready, AI-extractable content built around the queries the report identifies as gaps. From $197.
// Custom

Talk to a strategist

If your situation needs more than the productized work, we'll scope a custom engagement off the report findings.
// Frequently asked

Common questions about the AI Visibility Report.

What does the report actually contain?

+

Exactly what you saw in the sample: an executive summary, a critical-blocker check (robots.txt, schema, indexing), three-pillar grading on structure / authority / presence, an authority gap benchmarked against the brands ranking ahead of you, a 90-day prioritized action plan split into quick wins / 30-day / 90-day, and a queries table covering the 5 priority queries that matter most in your category.

Is this run by a tool or a person?

+

A senior strategist runs it. Tools surface signals, but the grading, the competitor analysis, and the action plan are written by a human. That is why the report reads as advice, not a CSV export.

Do you query ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude directly?

+

No — we run priority queries in your category through search and grade your site against the mention signals AI assistants use to pick sources: extractability, authority, freshness, third-party presence, and competitive ranking. Direct queries to ChatGPT or Perplexity give different answers per session and aren't a stable benchmark; the underlying signals are.

How is this different from a free AI visibility checker?

+

Free checkers tell you whether your brand was mentioned for a handful of queries on one run. They don't tell you why, what to fix, in what order, or how the brands beating you are doing it. The report answers all four, in your category specifically.

Why is it free?

+

The report is the diagnostic. Most teams act on the quick wins themselves and engage us only for the 30-day and 90-day work that needs lift. Some teams act on it and never speak to us again — that is fine.

Will you upload my site to ChatGPT or train models on my data?

+

No. We pull publicly accessible information about your domain and the queries in your category. We do not feed your site or your data into any LLM training process.

How long does it take?

+

You get the report inside 48 hours of submission. If we need clarification on category or geography, we email you — no calls.

Do you report on any domain?

+

Most B2B and B2C domains, yes. We don't report on gambling, adult content, or domains that fall outside our acceptable use policy. If your category is unusual or your site is mostly behind a login, email us first.

What if my brand is already getting mentioned?

+

Even better — the report becomes a defense plan. We benchmark your mention share against direct competitors, identify which queries you're winning vs. losing, and map the third-party content most likely to displace you.

// Run yours

Find out why AI
doesn't mention you.

Hand over a URL. We hand back a senior-level report, inside 48 hours, free.

Free · No credit card · 48-hour delivery · No call required